Cedar Decking vs. Pressure-Treated Lumber

Comparison

Cedar and pressure-treated lumber are the two most popular natural wood deck board options. Compare appearance, durability, cost, and maintenance so you can choose the right deck board for your project.

Quick Comparison

Criterion Cedar Decking Pressure-Treated Lumber
Natural Appearance Rich warm reddish-brown; attractive grain; premium aesthetic Greenish-brown when new; browns/grays as it weathers
Cost (5/4×6 deck boards) $2.50–$6.00/LF — 2–3× more than PT $0.80–$2.50/LF — most economical natural wood option
Natural Rot Resistance Naturally rot-resistant (heartwood) — no chemical treatment needed Chemically treated for rot resistance — varies by UC rating
Weight 23 lbs/cu ft — lightweight and easy to handle 30–35 lbs/cu ft (wet/green) — heavier, especially when freshly treated
Fastener Requirements Stainless steel preferred; HDG acceptable Must use HDG, stainless, or ACQ-approved coated fasteners — standard zinc erodes
Workability Excellent — machines, sands, and paints cleanly Good — machine normally; wet boards can be harder to cut cleanly

Our Recommendation

Choose cedar for visible deck boards when appearance is a priority and budget allows. Cedar's warm color, smooth finish, and splinter resistance make it the preferred upgrade from PT for homeowners seeking a natural wood look. It's also lighter and easier to handle.

Choose pressure-treated lumber for all structural framing (always), budget-driven projects, or applications where the boards are less visible. Many contractors use PT framing with cedar surface boards — a cost-effective hybrid that maximizes appearance where it matters most.

Detailed Analysis

The Smart Hybrid Approach

The most common professional approach is to use pressure-treated lumber for the entire structural frame (posts, beams, joists, ledger) and cedar for the visible deck boards and railing components. This delivers the durability and ground-contact performance of PT where it's needed, while showcasing cedar's natural beauty on the walking surface.

← Back to All Comparisons